"Warp World" not tagged as "MLD"
Nemesis666 2 months{"ops":[{"insert":"Hi, there is an issue with this card on the site, it's not tagged as MLD as it should.\n\nI dont know if I have to explain why it's clealy a MLD, since it's written on it, and it correspond at 100% to the definition of the RC & Gavin Verhey.\n\nThx for the fix ^^ !\n"}]}
-1
michael(Alpha User)
2 months{"ops":[{"insert":"So we actually talked about this when we were coming up with our MLD list. We explicitly didn't put it on the list because it was a bit tough to gauge whether or not the card would deny 4 or more lands (which is the threshold we're using). Honestly, I could still see it going either way since depending on board state, players can go positive on lands.\n\nI'm gonna ask in our discord and see what the masses think. Usually with this stuff it's pretty cut and dry, but in this case I'm not really convinced in either direction. \n"}]}
0
Nemesis666 2 months{"ops":[{"insert":"I think we just have to follow the rules gave by Gavin and the RC:\n\n- \"does this << can >> deny at least 4 Lands ? (Yours, the opponents ones, etc)\" \n- \"Yes\". \n- \"Its a(an) MLD\". \n\nHaving to talk between yourself(yourselves) or the community is like deciding yourselves. There is already a RC which statued on the situation. \n\nI really dont understand your answer, and this shock me. This means that any webside could say \"ho, hmmm, we decided that BloodMoon was not an MLD, we dont care about the rules gave by the RC nor Gavin Verhey\" oO. \n"}]}
0
