SnowCoveredPlainsWalker 55 days{"ops":[{"insert":"I wanted to let you folks know that I found an issue. \n\nThe Bracket estimate system is great but I found a huge flaw, and that is that the way the website is currently programmed, it doesn't check number of copies of a card when looking for the number of tutors in a deck. \n\nThis may not seem necessary since Commander is singleton, but Dragon's Approach is a tutor you can have any number of copies of in a deck, yet currently, having 35 of them in a deck still only registers as Bracket 2. \n\nI even tested to see if y'all had just made a weird exception to allow this, by putting 15 Diabolic Tutors in a deck and found that y'alls AI still only considered that test \"deck\" to be Bracket 2. So it's obviously set up to look at names, and not number of copies of the same name, which is a flaw. \n\nI wanted to bring this to your attention so that Dragon's Approach decks can be properly bracketed, as well as future proofing for other possible \"deck may contain any number of\" cards that tutor that may be printed in the future. \n\nThanks!\n\n"}]}
0
Larcondos 55 days{"ops":[{"insert":"Not a dev here but just gonna say, Dragon's Approach isn't really a Bracket 3 exclusive tutor? It either needs to be dumped into a graveyard or cast 5 times to tutor 1 dragon. For most purposes, a Dragon's Approach deck (ignoring anything else) can be Bracket 2 for sure.\n"}]}
0
SnowCoveredPlainsWalker 55 days{"ops":[{"insert":"Problem is, no matter how weak a tutor is, more than 3 of them puts you in Bracket 3 by default, so multiple Dragon's Approach is still Bracket 3 minimum as per WotCs definition \n"}]}
0
