blazingleek42 41 days{"ops":[{"insert":"Users currently have no way to filter search results based on deck cost or price range, which limits their ability to quickly find options that fit their budget. Adding a \"Filter by Cost\" feature would significantly improve usability and the overall search experience.\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Potential Requirements:"},{"insert":"\nAllow users to set a "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"minimum and maximum cost"},{"insert":" range when searching."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Provide common presets (e.g., \"Under $25\", \"$25–$50\", \"$50–$100\", \"Over $100\") for convenience."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Ensure compatibility with other existing filters (e.g., category, rating, etc.)."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Clearly show applied filters at the top of search results with an option to remove them."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\n\n\n"}]}
0
michael(Alpha User)
41 days{"ops":[{"insert":"Unfortunately there isn't a great way to do this from a technical standpoint. \n\nThe issue here, is that we do not track the total cost of a deck at all. The only way we calculate the total cost of the deck is summing the card prices after all the cards are loaded. We wouldn't be able to calculate the total cost of every deck durring search since that'd take too long. And we can't pre-calculate the total since card prices can change independently of the deck. \n\nThe best solution we've come up with is using our \"budget\" deck tag, though admitadly that is subjective. I wouldn't want hard-and-fast ranges as tags like you're suggesting since they'd likely go stale quickly (if a user tagged a deck, they didn't update it for X months, it'd likely be out of date).\n"}]}
0
