Ripple Foils

 avatar
{"ops":[{"insert":"Is there an ETA for the Ripple Foil variants from MH3? \n"}]}
0
 avatar
{"ops":[{"insert":"They have always been added, they're just listed as separate printings. \n\n"},{"attributes":{"link":"https://archidekt.com/card?name=Ulalek,%20Fused%20Atrocity&uid=66c46ae5-d83e-41b5-81ab-a3c9c482a44e"},"insert":"Example card"},{"insert":"\n"}]}
0
 avatar
{"ops":[{"insert":"The commanders and alternate commanders look to be the exceptions, as they have different set numbers from their non-foil version, like Surge foil cards, but this is not the case for the other ~99 cards in all 4 precon decks, the foil and nonfoil cards share the same set number. This is new to me, because I use a majority of the regular Ripple foils. No wonder no one has really brought this up if they stopped at those exceptions.\n\n"},{"insert":{"card-link":"Pyrogoyf"}},{"insert":"\n\nFor example, Pyrogoyf (59) has no regular foil version, so when selected as the default \"foil\", the call to other websites fail as there has been no addition of the proper Ripple Foil to this site yet. That is why foiling a Pyrogoyf (59) results as no cost to deck price for all markets besides Card Kingdom, OR there is an issue with how that process is done with this site, and exporting exact versions does not work for many applications. Etched foils have been implemented in they way I'd expect Ripples to, as there are some cards with only Etched foils and are recognized to be specifically not have the default foil when selected as foiled, so I would assume that the Ripple foil would be treated the same way for the majority of them, the ones that do not have separate set numbers to indicate their versio.\n"}]}
0