KlappC 4 days{"ops":[{"insert":"Hi,\n\nI noticed that dragon shield does not always export the full name of double sided cards. It seems to be somewhat random, i.e. for example for battles only the first part (\"Invasion of New Capenna\" instead of \"Invasion of New Capenna // Holy Frazzle-Cannon\") is exported for other types sometimes the full name. I am aware, that this is a dragonshield problem. However, I kinda expected the \"unsure\" feature to catch that. I provided the set code and collectors number, which should be unique, but I guess name is required for double checking. But then I kinda expected an unsure match if code/number matches but name does not."},{"attributes":{"table":"1"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\nIt doesn't affect too many cards and it's somewhat solvable, but I wasn't sure if that's intended behavior or if that should result in \"unsure\".\n(set code + collectors number -> no import possible\nand\nset code + collectors number + name only partial matching -> not found) \n\nBest, happy holidays, and a happy new year.\n\n"}]}
0
michael(Alpha User)
4 days{"ops":[{"insert":"It's intended. \n\nUnfortunately we must always check the full card name otherwise we run the risk of matching to an entirely different card. There are card names that share a name with the the front of double sided cards. (Art cards are the easiest example, but there are a few tokens that do this as well). \n\nEven if we applied an unsure tag, I'd rather just not find some handful of cards rather than matching on an entirely wrong card since we wouldn't really be able to inform the user (since it'd just look like a match). \n"}]}
0