{"ops":[{"insert":"I'm not smart enough to give specific ideas for how to address this inconvenience, so I will share my problem and maybe the problem has already been addressed!\n\nWhen I'm building a new deck, I create a private deck (I'll call this \"Deck 1\") with all cards that I'm considering, and I organize those cards into categories. Then, I clone the deck (\"Deck 2\") and trim down to 100 cards (I play commander). I then use Deck 1 as an organized Maybeboard.\n\nLater on, I want to add cards. If I want to just add it to the pool of cards I'm considering so that I don't forget about it, I can just add it to Deck 1. But, if I want to add it to my list (Deck 2), then I need to add it to both Deck 1 and Deck 2. To add some complexity, I use the Maybeboard on Deck 1 to keep a short-list of cards that I want to test.\n\nIt would be great if I could add cards to Deck 2 and have them automatically added to Deck 1 along with the categories that I assign. That said, there might be an even better way to do this!\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"While I'm happy you've found a workflow that works for you, I'm not sure on adding it as a feature. Doing so would add a fair bit of cost (eg: saving multiple decks at a time) and potentially cause issues during the saving process, which is something we try to avoid at all costs as it can result in lost data. \n\nIs there a reason you're not just using the maybeboard (or multiple maybeboards) to manage all of of this infomration? The whole point of having access to multiple maybeboards per deck is to allow users to do what you're doing, without the hassle of needing to manage multiple decks. \n\nIf the issue is you not wanting an extended list of cards in a single deck, you can always take a snapshot of the deck, and remove the undesired cards. \n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"Thank you for taking the time to reply. Super fair response and I understand that this is a risky undertaking for not very much payoff.\n\nI haven't experimented with using multiple maybeboards (ty for all of the features that are already in Arhcidekt!). I can experiment with that to see if it's better than my current workflow. My hesitation was that after a certain point (I think 300 cards), the scryfall-type syntax search stops working, but I need to deal with that anyways on my \"maybeboard decklist\". I'll report back once I've experimented with it!\n"}]}
0