Rhen_U 2 years{"ops":[{"insert":"I think having the ability to changes the prices of cards based on the quality can be beneficial. Personally for the LGS I go to, the owner pays my singles based on the market prices rather than it being lightly played or heavily played. Having the kind of versatility is nice because some people may not afford a lightly played or a near/pure mint card. \n"}]}
0
michael(Alpha User)
2 years{"ops":[{"insert":"I don't see us doing this unless a lot of people started asking for it. The prices are already subject to being inaccurate due to a few factors (how quickly we update our prices, the guesswork done on our end to match up cards 1:1, etc). \n\nThe prices of a deck are largely meant as an estimation of price rather than an exact market value. \n\nThe reason I'm not super into this idea is because.of a few reasons. The added complexity and storage size for card prices becomes far more complex when you're dealing with 5x the amount of prices per card, per vendor. But beyond that, I'm just not sure how much it'd go used. We have statistics that show most users don't change much interms of card details once a card is in their deck. So I don't see a reason to believe that a significant amount of users would take the time to build their deck with ever edition to have heavily played, near mint, etc. \n\nI'm not opposed to adding this to feature voting and seeing if there's any excitement around the idea though, it's entirely possible I'm off the mark here. \n"}]}
0