Flexibility around the budget

 avatar
JelloGresh avatarJelloGresh 20 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Hi there !\nFirst thanks for the website, it's absolutely insane and the exact thing I was dreaming about my whole magic player life. Intuituve, easy to learn, deep. Great great work everyone !\n\nI was wondering if there's any way to show the \"budget price\" version of a deck. I'll explain :\nWhen looking at a deck, we can see the value of the cards added, the value without base mana and the value without cards we already own in our collection.\nBut depending on the card version choosed by the creator of said deck, the price may drasticly vary.\nIs there any way to add the info somewhere, of the \"more budget\" overall price of a deck ? Like forcing the whole deck to automatically change to the cheaper (and legal) card version before getting a total ?\n\nI imagine it's not that easy, considering there are many cards not having any price or other problem like that, but hey, I wanted to ask :)\n"}]}
0
 avatar
{"ops":[{"insert":"First, thank you for the kind words! I'm glad to hear you've been enjoying the site.\n\nThis would definitely be a great feature to have. It's been suggested a couple of times before with very similar reasoning: Some people make pricey versions of decks that can be made for much cheaper, and it'd be good to know as someone viewing a deck if a non-fancy version is within your budget. Unfortunately, there's some technical reasons that make this difficult, the primary result being that deck pages would load slower as we pull additional data on load. \n\nThat said, if you copy someone else's deck, you can press Ctrl+a to select the entire deck then use the multiselect widget (bottom left of your screen on desktop) to optimize all card printings to their cheapest versions. This isn't a great solution when you're browsing through a number of decks, but definitely helps if you've got one you're zeroing on.\n\nRegardless, I apologize for the disappointing response! This is something that's on our radar to address in some form whenever we figure out a way to do it without sacrificing site performance. \n"}]}
0
 avatar
JelloGresh avatarJelloGresh 20 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Disappointing response ?\nYou're telling me there already is a built in solution for my question and I should consider that a bad answer ?\n\nYou guys are truly geniuses\n\nThanks for letting me know such widget exists !\n"}]}
1